Update 2022-03-02 15:47

This commit is contained in:
Jean-Sébastien
2022-03-02 15:47:54 +01:00
parent ac1e628013
commit 21bf9fdba5
194 changed files with 1653 additions and 1216 deletions
+95 -36
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<!-- 2022-03-01 Tue 08:14 -->
<!-- 2022-03-02 Wed 15:45 -->
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Pre-Quantum Electrodynamics</title>
@@ -1622,15 +1622,11 @@ Table of contents
</svg></a><span class="headline-id">emd.Fl.Fl</span></h4>
<div class="outline-text-4" id="text-emd_Fl_Fl">
<p>
1831: 3 experiments by Faraday (according to Griffiths! but it's historically incorrect)
\paragraph{1)} Pull a loop of wire through a magnetic field.
\paragraph{2)} Move magnet around a still loop.
\paragraph{3)} Change strength of field, holding magnet and loop still.
Around 1831, Faraday performed a number of experiments pertaining to
the effects of time-dependent fields.
</p>
<p>
Actually, historically, things didn't happen like that.
The first experiment that Faraday performed (1831) involved two metal coils wound
on opposite sides of a metal ring. When a current was turned on through the first
coil, it generated a transient current in the second coil (as measured by a
@@ -1647,27 +1643,39 @@ on this idea. Faraday observed transient current in a circuit when:
<p>
Faraday's big insight was to summarize these effects by noticing that
</p>
<p>
\[
\boxed{
\mbox{\bf A changing magnetic field induces an electric field}
}
\boxed{
\mbox{A changing magnetic field induces an electric field.}
}
\]
</p>
<p>
Empirically: the changing magnetic field induces an electric current around
the circuit. This current is really driven by an electric field having a component
along the wire. The line integral of this field is called the
</p>
<div class="core div" id="org03c55ba">
<div class="core div" id="orgdfb0aad">
<p>
<b>Electromotive force (or electromotance)</b>,
\[
{\cal E} \equiv \oint_{\cal P} {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf l}.
\]
</p>
<div class="eqlabel" id="org64afdaf">
<p>
<a id="elmofo"></a><a href="./emd_Fl_Fl.html#elmofo"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor" class="bi bi-link" viewBox="0 0 16 16">
<path d="M6.354 5.5H4a3 3 0 0 0 0 6h3a3 3 0 0 0 2.83-4H9c-.086 0-.17.01-.25.031A2 2 0 0 1 7 10.5H4a2 2 0 1 1 0-4h1.535c.218-.376.495-.714.82-1z"/>
<path d="M9 5.5a3 3 0 0 0-2.83 4h1.098A2 2 0 0 1 9 6.5h3a2 2 0 1 1 0 4h-1.535a4.02 4.02 0 0 1-.82 1H12a3 3 0 1 0 0-6H9z"/>
</svg></a>
</p>
<div class="alteqlabels" id="orgb3cda90">
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>Gr (7.9)</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p>
\[
{\cal E} \equiv \oint_{\cal P} {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf l}.
\tag{elmofo}\label{elmofo}
\]
</p>
</div>
@@ -1676,21 +1684,56 @@ You can think of the emf in different ways. It's the energy accumulated as a uni
</p>
<p>
The precise statement is that the electromotive force is proportional
The precise statement associated to Faraday's observations
is that the electromotive force is proportional
to the rate of change of the magnetic flux,
</p>
<div class="eqlabel" id="orgec7b520">
<p>
<a id="Fl_flux"></a><a href="./emd_Fl_Fl.html#Fl_flux"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor" class="bi bi-link" viewBox="0 0 16 16">
<path d="M6.354 5.5H4a3 3 0 0 0 0 6h3a3 3 0 0 0 2.83-4H9c-.086 0-.17.01-.25.031A2 2 0 0 1 7 10.5H4a2 2 0 1 1 0-4h1.535c.218-.376.495-.714.82-1z"/>
<path d="M9 5.5a3 3 0 0 0-2.83 4h1.098A2 2 0 0 1 9 6.5h3a2 2 0 1 1 0 4h-1.535a4.02 4.02 0 0 1-.82 1H12a3 3 0 1 0 0-6H9z"/>
</svg></a>
</p>
<div class="alteqlabels" id="orgf70f495">
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>Gr (7.14)</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p>
\[
{\cal E} = \oint_{\cal P} {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf l} = -\frac{d\Phi}{dt}
\label{Gr(7.14)}
\tag{Fl_flux}\label{Fl_flux}
\]
so we obtain
</p>
<div class="core div" id="org93f9990">
<div class="core div" id="orgdfedc05">
<p>
<b>Faraday's law</b> (integral form <i>N.B.: for a stationary loop</i>)
\[
\oint_{\cal P} {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf l} = -\int_{\cal S} \frac{\partial {\bf B}}{\partial t} \cdot d{\bf a}
\label{Gr(7.15)}
\]
</p>
<div class="eqlabel" id="orge87df83">
<p>
<a id="Fl_int"></a><a href="./emd_Fl_Fl.html#Fl_int"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor" class="bi bi-link" viewBox="0 0 16 16">
<path d="M6.354 5.5H4a3 3 0 0 0 0 6h3a3 3 0 0 0 2.83-4H9c-.086 0-.17.01-.25.031A2 2 0 0 1 7 10.5H4a2 2 0 1 1 0-4h1.535c.218-.376.495-.714.82-1z"/>
<path d="M9 5.5a3 3 0 0 0-2.83 4h1.098A2 2 0 0 1 9 6.5h3a2 2 0 1 1 0 4h-1.535a4.02 4.02 0 0 1-.82 1H12a3 3 0 1 0 0-6H9z"/>
</svg></a>
</p>
<div class="alteqlabels" id="org7b32fe7">
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>Gr (7.15)</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p>
\[
\oint_{\cal P} {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf l} = -\int_{\cal S} \frac{\partial {\bf B}}{\partial t} \cdot d{\bf a}
\tag{Fl_int}\label{Fl_int}
\]
</p>
</div>
@@ -1702,20 +1745,36 @@ for any loop (on a wire or not). Using Stokes' theorem,
\]
we obtain
</p>
<div class="core div" id="org6046a76">
<div class="core div" id="orgafa0d15">
<div class="eqlabel" id="org13d3c14">
<p>
<a id="Fl"></a><a href="./emd_Fl_Fl.html#Fl"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor" class="bi bi-link" viewBox="0 0 16 16">
<path d="M6.354 5.5H4a3 3 0 0 0 0 6h3a3 3 0 0 0 2.83-4H9c-.086 0-.17.01-.25.031A2 2 0 0 1 7 10.5H4a2 2 0 1 1 0-4h1.535c.218-.376.495-.714.82-1z"/>
<path d="M9 5.5a3 3 0 0 0-2.83 4h1.098A2 2 0 0 1 9 6.5h3a2 2 0 1 1 0 4h-1.535a4.02 4.02 0 0 1-.82 1H12a3 3 0 1 0 0-6H9z"/>
</svg></a>
</p>
<div class="alteqlabels" id="orgd662a28">
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>Gr (7.16)</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p>
<b>Faraday's law</b> (differential form)
\[
{\boldsymbol \nabla} \times {\bf E} = -\frac{\partial {\bf B}}{\partial t}
\label{Gr(7.16)}
\]
\[
{\boldsymbol \nabla} \times {\bf E} = -\frac{\partial {\bf B}}{\partial t}
\tag{Fl}\label{Fl}
\]
</p>
</div>
<p>
Right-hand rule always sorts signs out. Easier rule: {\bf Lenz's law}, which
states that {\bf nature resists a change in flux}. This is in fact just
{\bf Le Ch\^atelier's principle} of any action at an equilibrium point leading
Right-hand rule always sorts signs out. Easier rule: <b>Lenz's law</b>, which
states that physical systems naturally resist a change in flux.
This is in fact just
<b>Le Châtelier's principle</b> of any action at an equilibrium point leading
to an opposing counter-reaction.
</p>
</div>
@@ -1739,7 +1798,7 @@ target="_blank">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.
</div>
<div id="postamble" class="status">
<p class="author">Author: Jean-Sébastien Caux</p>
<p class="date">Created: 2022-03-01 Tue 08:14</p>
<p class="date">Created: 2022-03-02 Wed 15:45</p>
<p class="validation"></p>
</div>